It took 9 months for Bush Administration to post Lohn to the job. Will Obama/Lubchenko act faster for the sake of our salmon and killer whales?
|
It took 9 months for Bush Administration to post Lohn to the job. Will Obama/Lubchenko act faster for the sake of our salmon and killer whales?
|
Posted in Uncategorized
Lubchenco and Sutley (head of CEQ) are coming to NW next week to talk to scientists about Columbia/Snake salmon. A very welcome development. Unfortunately, they aren’t talking to any conservation groups, or fishermen, who have to be part of the solution. What’s up with that? See Joel Connelly’s recent blog in the P-I.
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
|
Posted in Uncategorized
|
|
Gregg Schorr for Brad, dive behavior
Prey field mapping in Sept, 2004 (after sockeye, during fall Chinook run): big targets are near middle of water column (>100m); prey assemblages different in Haro Strait?
Wild Salmon Center identified rivers with multiple runs and little development that could be wild salmon “strongholds” or refuges during an age of global warming.
40 deployments 93-2000, 419 hours data, median duration of deployment 10.5hrs. Velocity spikes are often associated with deepest portion of dive (and some shallow dives).
What are accelerations in shallow dives? (Tried critter cam)
All individuals old/young and across pods have similar dive profiles and all swam slower at night, but males dive deeper than female adults (but only during day). There is also an inexplicable change in depth of dives over the years.
Focal follows show they don’t go to the bottom (e.g. 150m dive in 300m water). This summer we’ll use new tags with a hydrophone and body orientation sensors. Also planned are satellite tagging efforts.
Rich Osborne, long-term patterns in SRKW residency
43,000 sightings in the OrcaMaster database 1980-2008 (biased towards summer initially, but in last 2 decades it’s become more balanced). Puget Sound is Admiralty Inlet and Deception Pass south.
After L pod members spent ~a month in Dyes Inlet, they extended their stay in inland waters ever since. They didn’t often do that before. This suggests they can adapt to different prey (e.g. Chilco Creek Chum) when stressed (there was only chum to eat in Dye’s Inlet).
NW Straits and Puget Sound seem to be getting more attention in last decade compared with previous 2 decades. We should be spending all PS salmon restoration money for those wild rivers.
Posted in Uncategorized
Pete for Steve Rafferty, epidemiological and pathologic findings
Only 10/81 confirmed SR deaths and 4/142 of NR were beach cast and available for post-mortem examination. Infectious pneumonia is most common reported cause of mortality (60% of those necropsied). We now have a standardized protocol for doing necropsies (available at http://seadocsociety.org) Since 2002, Steve and Joe Gaydos have been trying to determine if bacterial infection was the primary cause of death.
Pete Schroeder, microbial assessment of orca breath and marine microlayer
Used 4 petri dishes swept through blow of adult males. Each dish has a different medium. Sampled in 06-08, mostly in late summer/fall.
Partial results:
Q: Has there been any attempt to correlate the bacteria in the microlayer you sample with local sources of contamination? Sewer water is a likely source of antibiotics and endocrine disruptors.
Kathrine Ayres, physiological monitoring of SRKW
Looked at two compounds and two sources of change:
Prey levels (DFO test catch fishery, Chinook CPUE) and boat density time series increase in May, peak mid-summer, and tail off in the fall. Samples taken with pool net or 2-liter bottle examined per gram of dry weight.
Results:
John Durban, Size and body condition of SRKWs
Southern residents are food limited and culturally specialized to Chinook prey. Used laser pointers for morphometrics (of commonly visible body parts). Pitmann, 2007 used size of type C killer whales in Antarctica. 10 filights in September 2008 (elevation >750′ according to permit), 12,000 photos, differential GPS gave accuracy of 2-3m (altitude). Measured length, girth, and head width, calibrated with boat photos.
We were able to estimate boat lengths well. We can see growth curves and hope to be able to resolve changes in growth rate. We can use the head width to estimate body condition. Dependent young tend to have fattest head, and their mothers are often the thinnest.
Posted in Uncategorized
Sandra O’Neill, Contaminants in salmon
We’ve heard that S and N residents are both eating mostly Chinook. Why are the southern residents more contaminated than the northern residents?
Contaminants in fish are determined by:
Chinook and Coho have elevated [PBDE] because they stay close to shore, while other salmon have undetectable levels. For PCBs are more widely dispersed and present in all salmon, but are highest in Chinook. Puget Sound fish are always much more contaminated than northern fish.
Along the west coast, [PCB] peaks at Puget Sound and are about the same at Skeena (north extreme) and Sacramento (south exptreme). Within Puget Sound, the resident Chinook (blackmouth) are ~3x as contaminated as non-resident Chinook.
Prey quality is also decreasing along W coast. Size is decreasing and kcal/fish is variable. PS fish are smaller and have lower lipid concentration. This means Puget Sound non/resident Chinook will give you ~7/16X PCBs compared to Skeena Chinook!
Peggy Krahn, persistent organic pollutants (POPs) threats to SRKWs
Fisheries and Oceans Canada collected 3 biopsy samples in 2004; NWFSC collected 18 samples in 2006-7.
Most SRKWs have [PCB] exceeding threshold for health effects. Juveniles have much higher concentrations of many POPs (PBDEs, HCGs, and HCB) than adults in their pods. This happened mostly by transfer from their mothers during lactation. The levels are above the estimated threshhold for health effects.
The prevalence of DDT use in CA raises the ratio of DDTs/PCBs above 1. K and L pods have this California signature while J pod doesn’t, which is nicely explained by the observation that J pod haven’t been observed south of Newport, OR.
Teresa Mongillo, predicted contaminant levels in SRKWs
Developed an IB Model which assumes that the Amount of prey consumed = PCB, PBDE in prey + milk – gestation -lactation
Currently there is no change in the [PCB] while [PBDE] is increasing exponentially. Projections were made for different scenarios (variable rates of increase). The model predicts that PCBs will begin to decline after 20+ years; PBDE levels will exceed current PCB levels in 2-40 years.
PCBs increase with age in males, but decreases with offspring in females. In contrast, PBDEs don’t seem to increase but they cluster into groups that are living vs dead… this suggests a potential dose-related effect on calf survival. PCBs decrease with birth order (the first-born gets the biggest load).
Questions:
Rich Osborne: Are heavy metals in such low concentration that they are not of concern? Peggy: Epidermis samples are reserved for stable isotopes and genetics, so there is a sample size limitation. Sandra: Hg levels are slightly higher in Chinook and Coho.
Jeff Lorton: Should we tell our passengers not to eat Chinook? Should we catch/release Chinook across whole region?
Ken Balcomb: Has anyone initiated a study of POPs in local humans, e.g. sports and commercial fishers? There is good analogous study from the Great Lakes.